![]() ![]() ![]() React or any other JS framework have the same problems with SEO unless you are using only the basic functions and the CSS that comes with them "Long" no more as Flutter is already solved that problemĪt least we agree on something, but do not see why you are mentioning this, I was under the impression you want to argue about Flutter VS React or something No idea what is that supposed to be referencing or proving Unfortunately none of the JS frameworks got rewritten in TS, they just adopted only the strong typed part of Typescript Never wrote Typescript is a Framework, it mentioned that makes using some of the previously popular frameworks pointless, as most of what React and similar frameworks do is way easy to do directly with vanila Typescript, so 80-90% of set framework code is pointless. Please read before commenting and may be don't involve gods in a simple technical discussion Not to say JS devs are much better, but at least most screen readers can take a stab at what the hell is going on. In addition although the tools are there, nobody is handling accessibility with Flutter well. Until Flutter can handle that, it will not replace Traditional web apps that are either good-old server side rendered, statically generated, or use something like Universal. Writing something like an eCommerce site that relies on search engine discovery to generate traffic is setting yourself up for failure. These are cases where you don’t care about SEO, site maps, etc. Things like dashboards, games, interactive experiences. Today is not that day.įlutter works reasonably well for web apps. I long for the day where something like Flutter can actually replace these things. The JS ecosystem is a mess and I do not enjoy dealing with it, you’re correct about dependency hell. Maybe you’ll be the author of the next big JS fad-framework, since that’s what you’ll be building. Try writing a complex PWA with those features, equipped to handle many use cases with full testing, in “vanilla” TS and get back to us with how it went. These are entire frameworks with routers, state management, dependency injection, etc. It is not a framework.Īngular has used TS since v2. It is a superset of JS that I greatly enjoy using, providing pseudo type-safety and a much improved dev experience. TypeScript does nothing to replace frameworks like Angular, Vue, Svelte or otherwise. For blogs and e-commerce you definitely need a lot of work getting decent SEO capabilities in a Flutter website. Flutter for web isn't always bad, but when saying that Flutter web is the best for everything (which he is responding to) you will only disappoint people. WebApp != WebSite, Flutter for website bad, Flutter for WebApp good.Įven though he said it a bit harsh, I think you actually agree here with kbcool. It's ok to be a rabid fanboy of Flutter for mobile apps but please don't bullshit people over its web capabilities." "Flutter is the best framework for web applications at the moment, you can do anything you want with it" Let's also have a look at the post he's responding on: I'd use Flutter only for apps that are not content heavy.Īnd my argument is not with OP, it's with the person who claimed that flutter web (as a blanket statement) sucks. But I would even say that the requirements for blogs are really similar and should also focus on SEO. This thread starts with the question if it can also be good for e-commerce. ![]() OP: "One follow up question, would it be possible to even build a nice e-commerce store on the web using Flutter Web? Or will it be a bit buggy at this stage?" The OP question is if it's good for a blog not for e-commerce. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |